How to Criticize Up and Down Your Organization and Make It Pay Off Essay

How to Criticize Up and Down Your Organization and Make It Pay Off - Essay ExampleThat said, Weisinger points issue that lit crit is necessary for growth. For instance, Weisinger (1989) states that the Romantic arrest in philosophy, politics and the arts came about beca physical exercise the individuals involved with the Romantic period criticized the neoclassical period, and because unfavorable judgment of the neoclassical followers had their criticism suppressed. Weisinger (1989) further point out that Louis the XIV suppressed criticism, and the response to this was the American and French revolutions. In other words, when criticism is stifled a cataclysm might develop which changes the status quo. Moreover, Weisinger states that criticism from the likes of Galileo, Darwin and Freud changes societies in general. Criticism is necessary for growth, and criticism cannot be suppressed without consequences. Therefore, according to Weisinger (1989), criticism, being necessary for gro wth and change, and being necessary to influence, motivate and change behavior, essential be expressed in a positive way so that the criticism can be takeed and useful, as opposed to simply oppose and demoralizing. Weisinger further states that there are barriers to individuals accepting criticism and applying the criticism to their lives to makes themselves, and the organization, better. There are psychological hurdles which must be overcome. Weisinger talks in equipment casualty of cognitive appraisal, which means that individuals have a mental framework with which they receive information like criticism, and this framework dictates how the criticism will be processed. The framework is construct through classical conditioning criticism in the past has produced a negative response, so sit criticism, even if tactfully presented, will also present the negative response. Moreover, since criticism is often portrayed in the media as negative such as headlines which link criticis m to failure the mind links the deuce concepts together. Criticism equals failure. Modeling is another psychological force at work, and this means that how ones family criticized one another is what is known to the individual. If ones parents responds to criticism by yelling, making retaliatory comments, or leaving the room, the individual is likely to do the same. The modeling focuses upon how one criticizes, as well as how one reacts to criticism. operant learning is also a force at work, and this is when an individual does X, he gets the result of Y. A worker responds to criticism with anger, so the supervisor backs off. This reinforces the angry response, so that the worker continues to use this response when criticized. Since criticism is obviously necessary, because there can be no growth and change without it, and individuals are hard-wired either to not accept criticism gracefully or to give criticism in a counter-productive manner, what can be done? This question is the fo cus of Heidringers book and and analysis. The book of the analysis is that criticism must be redefined in a manner that it is not seen as tearing somebody down, but, rather, giving them information which they can use to improve. This is an important message to myself and my future career growth, not just because it is inevitable that I will be criticized, so I need to know how to call this criticism and apply it so that it is not negative but positive, but also because it will help me learn how to criticize so that any aggroup that I